14. Politicians and trust

This page contains the current draft of the full text of Chapter 14 of RAFT 2035. All content is subject to change.

To offer comments and suggestions on the following material, please use this shared Google document.


14. Politicians and trust

Goal 14 of RAFT 2035 is that politicians will no longer act in ways that are self-serving, untrustworthy, or incompetent.

Slide14

As a result of progress towards this goal, members of the general public will hold politicians in much higher regard and respect.

This is the first in a group of two goals in the sphere of significantly improved political flourishing. With progress towards both of these goals, society will increasingly be guided by the best of human insight, in close, productive collaboration with the best of AI insight.

Politicians mistrusted and disliked

Given the key role of politics in progressing the other goals set out in this roadmap, it’s a major drawback that there is as much mistrust and dislike of politicians as is presently the case in the UK. Instead of encouraging and enabling collaboration between multiple different groups of talent and insight in the country, our politicians are creating more division and more hard-heartedness.

The 2019 Ipsos MORI “Veracity Index” poll measured the level of esteem attributed to a variety of professions by members of the British public. Respondents to the survey were asked if they generally trusted people from specified professions to tell the truth.

Politicians came at the very bottom of the list, with a positive rating of only 14%. This is worse than, for example, advertising executives (17%), journalists (26%), estate agents (30%), business leaders (35%), and bankers (43%). For comparison, the profession of nurses came out best, with a positive rating of 95%, followed by doctors on 93%, and teachers on 89%.

As a further indication of the dire state of the reputation of politicians in the UK, consider the Edelman “Trust Barometer” findings for 2019. This contains the following evaluations by members of the public of various traits of politicians in the UK:

  • “Honest with the public” – judged as a most important trait by 72% of respondents, but 58% said that “few/none of the UK’s political leaders show this trait”.
  • “A good communicator” – judged as a most important trait by 64% of respondents, but 38% said that “few/none of the UK’s political leaders show this trait”.

Positive roles for politicians

However, there’s nothing inevitable about politicians being held in such poor regard. The European Social Survey regularly evaluates the level of trust in politicians in 32 countries in and around Europe. The UK generally ranks about 12th best in this survey – well ahead of countries such as Poland, Portugal, Ukraine, Croatia, and Bulgaria, but significantly behind Denmark (the top of the list), Switzerland, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Iceland.

Let’s remember the vital role that politicians can play in society: to deliberate, speak, and act on behalf of all citizens, protecting the community from exploitation by members of powerful subgroups. Politicians establish and then regularly review the operation of laws – laws whereby members of society collectively agree to give up various potential freedoms, and to accept specific responsibilities, in order that society gains overall with greater individual flourishing too. In this vision, to be a politician is to be a servant of the community.

In times of faster change in technology and social structures, wise political action becomes even more important. This will require politicians who can absorb new information, incorporate the latest insights from multiple fields of knowledge, update their worldviews, and revise legal and political systems speedily and decisively. In short, it will require a new calibre of politician, able to take advantage of the best understanding that becomes available, rather than sticking to the slogans that have gained them some personal popularity in the past.

Improving trust and respect

Measures that can increase the level of trust and respect for politicians include:

  • Increased transparency, to counter any suspicions of hidden motivations or vested interests
  • Automated real-time objective fact-checking, so that politicians know any distortions of the truth will be quickly pointed out
  • The calculation and publication of “reliability indexes” for individual politicians, based on the quality of their words and deeds, as evaluated against agreed criteria
  • Encouragement of individual politicians with high ethical standards and integrity
  • Enforcement of penalties in any cases where politicians knowingly create or pass on false information
  • Easier mechanisms for the electorate to be able to quickly “recall” a politician when they have lost the trust of voters
  • Improvements in mental health for everyone (as covered in Goal 2), including politicians, thereby diminishing tendencies for dysfunctional behaviour
  • Regular psychometric assessment of politicians, to highlight warning signs early
  • Diminished power for political parties to constrain how individual politicians express themselves, allowing more politicians to speak according to their own true conscience
  • Changes in the voting system, to enable and encourage electors to vote for the candidates they most admire, rather than feeling obliged to vote tactically.

Improving the voting system

The proposed change in the voting system will move beyond the present outdated “first past the post” voting system. Under the current system, voters frequently feel unable to vote for the candidate that most matches their own outlooks, fearing that it would be a wasted vote with the undesired side-effect of letting a deeply disliked candidate win the election. However, under a system of ranked transferable votes, voters could indicate not only their first choice, but also a complete ranking of the other candidates. This change will allow more authentic voting.

In parallel with the adoption of ranked transferable votes, a revision from single-MP constituencies to larger multi-MP regional constituencies, similar to those already used for EU elections, will address the currently over-high barriers of entry being faced by new parties. As a result, it will enable more fluid changes within the set of political parties.

Here are some important consequences of these changes in the political system:

  1. Politicians will need to become better at working in coalitions and alliances with people from different parties. Of course, that’s a good skill to develop!
  2. Politicians will have to demonstrate their own individual qualities, rather than expecting to coast into parliament merely by belonging to a popular party.
  3. The power of big finance to control politicians should diminish, as individual politicians can take advantage of technology to communicate their messages to the electorate at low cost but high fidelity.
  4. The pace of political change should increase, allowing regulations and incentives (such as subsidies) to update quickly in line with fast changes in the worlds of technology and business.

Positive examples of system change

The task of changing the electoral system faces a challenge. The parties that fare badly under the current system (and which likely have the biggest motivation to support a change in the system) are those that failed to win the election; therefore they lack the power to put that change in place. Conversely, the parties that did win the election have less motivation to make such a change.

However, we should remember that:

  • Even under the first past the post system, governments sometimes consist of coalitions – as in the UK from 2010 to 2015. Minority parties can make their support of such a coalition conditional upon legislation being brought forwards to reform elections.
  • Many countries serve as examples of where first past the post was formerly used, but was subsequently rejected. This list includes Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Lebanon, Malta, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, and South Africa.

Interim targets

To accelerate progress with Goal 14, two interim targets for 2025 are proposed:

  1. Obtain majority public support for the design of a system to replace first past the post election – a new system that would eliminate a cause of a great deal of the ambivalence and hostility people feel towards their MPs. This step will, moreover, establish the groundwork for the other changes described earlier.
  2. Agree an understanding of the actual purpose of politicians, including the key role of the public sector in a mixed economy. This understanding will also include awareness of the role of industrial strategy – a concept that has often been unfairly maligned. Effective industrial strategy is vital to the success of many of the other goals in this roadmap.

Moving forwards

Beyond the improvements in politics resulting from this goal, the next chapter anticipates further changes in the capability and trustworthiness of politics, from a wider use of AI and other decision support tools.

For more information

<< Previous chapter <<   =====   >> Next chapter >>

Recent Posts

RAFT 2035 – a new initiative for a new decade

The need for a better politics is more pressing than ever.

Since its formation, Transpolitica has run a number of different projects aimed at building momentum behind a technoprogressive vision for a better politics. For a new decade, it’s time to take a different approach, to build on previous initiatives.

The planned new vehicle has the name “RAFT 2035”.

RAFT is an acronym:

  • Roadmap (‘R’) – not just a lofty aspiration, but specific steps and interim targets
  • towards Abundance (‘A’) for all – beyond a world of scarcity and conflict
  • enabling Flourishing (‘F’) as never before – with life containing not just possessions, but enriched experiences, creativity, and meaning
  • via Transcendence (‘T’) – since we won’t be able to make progress by staying as we are.

RAFT is also a metaphor. Here’s a copy of the explanation:

When turbulent waters are bearing down fast, it’s very helpful to have a sturdy raft at hand.

The fifteen years from 2020 to 2035 could be the most turbulent of human history. Revolutions are gathering pace in four overlapping fields of technology: nanotech, biotech, infotech, and cognotech, or NBIC for short. In combination, these NBIC revolutions offer enormous new possibilities – enormous opportunities and enormous risks:…

Rapid technological change tends to provoke a turbulent social reaction. Old certainties fade. New winners arrive on the scene, flaunting their power, and upturning previous networks of relationships. Within the general public, a sense of alienation and disruption mingles with a sense of profound possibility. Fear and hope jostle each other. Whilst some social metrics indicate major progress, others indicate major setbacks. The claim “You’ve never had it so good” coexists with the counterclaim “It’s going to be worse than ever”. To add to the bewilderment, there seems to be lots of evidence confirming both views.

The greater the pace of change, the more intense the dislocation. Due to the increased scale, speed, and global nature of the ongoing NBIC revolutions, the disruptions that followed in the wake of previous industrial revolutions – seismic though they were – are likely to be dwarfed in comparison to what lies ahead.

Turbulent times require a space for shelter and reflection, clear navigational vision despite the mists of uncertainty, and a powerful engine for us to pursue our own direction, rather than just being carried along by forces outside our control. In short, turbulent times require a powerful “raft” – a roadmap to a future in which the extraordinary powers latent in NBIC technologies are used to raise humanity to new levels of flourishing, rather than driving us over some dreadful precipice.

The words just quoted come from the opening page of a short book that is envisioned to be published in January 2020. The chapters of this book are reworked versions of the scripts used in the recent “Technoprogressive roadmap” series of videos.

Over the next couple of weeks, all the chapters of this proposed book will be made available for review and comment:

  • As pages on the Transpolitica website, starting here
  • As shared Google documents, starting here, where comments and suggestions are welcome.

RAFT Cover 21

All being well, RAFT 2035 will also become a conference, held sometime around the middle of 2020.

You may note that, in that way that RAFT 2035 is presented to the world,

  • The word “transhumanist” has moved into the background – since that word tends to provoke many hostile reactions
  • The word “technoprogressive” also takes a backseat – since, again, that word has negative connotations in at least some circles.

If you like the basic idea of what’s being proposed, here’s how you can help:

  • Read some of the content that is already available, and provide comments
    • If you notice something that seems mistaken, or difficult to understand
    • If you think there is a gap that should be addressed
    • If you think there’s a better way to express something.

Thanks in anticipation!

  1. A reliability index for politicians? 1 Reply
  2. Technoprogressive Roadmap conf call Leave a reply
  3. Transpolitica and the TPUK Leave a reply
  4. There’s more to democracy than voting Leave a reply
  5. Superdemocracy: issues and opportunities Leave a reply
  6. New complete book awaiting reader reviews Leave a reply
  7. Q4 update: Progress towards “Sustainable superabundance” Leave a reply
  8. Q3 sprint: launch the Abundance Manifesto Leave a reply
  9. Q2 sprint: Political responses to technological unemployment Leave a reply